Legal Opinion

Stout v. Robnett

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided March 3, 2000No. C.A. 2:99-2693-23Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DUFFY, District Judge.

This matter brought by the pro se Plaintiffs is before the Court for review of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and the local rules of the Court, that the Court should grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss.

The Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of a Magistrate Judge’s Report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that Report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Any written objection must…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Walter Gordon v. William D. Leeke, Commissioner Joe Martin, Warden, Wayne Stephen Young v. George H. Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  5. Robert J. Fine v. The City of New York, Anthony SaladinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API