Bernstein v. Virgin Am., Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
Nor has Virgin "come forward with evidence of the precise amount of work performed or with evidence to negative the reasonableness" of using Virgin's required start time to measure Plaintiffs' work. Tyson Foods , 136 S.Ct. at 1047 (citation omitted). Virgin produced an excerpt of a single employee's deposition testimony regarding her own occasional lateness. ECF No. 352-1 at 14. This does not create a genuine issue of material fact whether its employees were late with such frequency as to render Plaintiffs' damages model unreasonable or unjust.
Accordingly, the Court will use Plaintiffs'…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2012
- Caliber Bodyworks, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Haralson v. U.S. Aviation Servs. Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Bernstein v. Virgin America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- The Human Rights Defense Center v. U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021