Legal Opinion

Cobbey v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 29, 1931No. 12,411PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

To review a judgment of $1,066.60 entered against him, the defendant brings error. The principal question presented by the record is the plaintiff’s claimed right to be subrogated to the defendant in the matter of a certain promissory note executed by one Schmid to the United Service Corporation and by it sold to the defendant.

It appears that on October 21, 1926, Schmid made the note involved and to secure it gave a chattel mortgage. The note was for $1,105, and payable in monthly installments of $50 with interest at 8 per cent per annum payable monthly. When it was proposed to the defendant…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cathcart v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. Clarke v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  3. Schilling v. RomingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
  4. Cree v. LewisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  5. Danielson v. GudeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Burke v. BurkeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
  2. Western Cas. & Sur. Co. v. BowlingColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Burke v. BurkeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
  4. Adams v. DaviesUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Continental Bus Systems, Inc. v. RohwerDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API