Legal Opinion
Burke v. Burke
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided January 28, 1952No. Civil Action 247PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
86 A.2d 51 (1952)
BURKE
v.
BURKE.
Civil Action 247.
Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.
January 28, 1952.
Arthur G. Logan and Stephen E. Hamilton, Jr., Wilmington, for plaintiff.
John P. Sinclair (of Berl, Potter & Anderson), Wilmington, for defendant.
This is an action for specific performance of a separation agreement. The case was before the court upon complaint and motion to dismiss.
BRAMHALL, Vice Chancellor.
The complaint shows that on September 29, 1949, the plaintiff and defendant, who were then married but were at that time living separate and apart, entered into a separation agreement…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barber v. International Co. of MexicoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Peters v. PetersCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
- Byram v. MinerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Cobbey v. PetersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
- Coxe v. CoxeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Zouck v. ZouckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- McNelis v. BruceArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Carothers v. CarothersOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Astle v. WenkeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.