Legal Opinion

In re Fanta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 3, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Third Judicial Department on January 20, *701981 and, at all times pertinent to this proceeding, respondent engaged in the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

Respondent is charged with violating Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102 (A) (4) and (7) (now [8]), DR 6-101 (A) (2) and (3), and DR 9-102 (C) (3) (22 NYCRR 1200.3, 1200.30, 1200.46) because, inter alia, he neglected six legal matters entrusted to him, made misrepresentations to clients and to the Committee,…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re RabinowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re SiegelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re BetancourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re FantaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re KreitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. In re HershbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API