Legal Opinion

In re Fanta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 4, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent Ronald Herbert Fanta was admitted to the *173practice of law in the State of New York by the Third Judicial Department on January 20, 1981. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

By order dated October 3, 1996 (225 AD2d 69), this Court suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of three years for neglecting legal matters entrusted to him, making misrepresentations to clients and to the Departmental Disciplinary Committee (Committee) and submitting forged…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. In re FantaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. In re PanditAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re RamirezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re CollazoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. In re WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. In re WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. In re FierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API