Barraclough v. Barraclough
Utah Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The sole question raised by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in refusing to modify a decree as to the amount of money to be paid appellant in granting her a divorce from respondent.
The record reveals that at the time appellant was seeking a divorce from respondent the parties entered into a written “stipulation” whereby it was agreed that in the event a divorce was granted to the plaintiff, Abbie L. Barra-clough, appellant herein, “the decree shall provide that the defendant pay to the plaintiff, as temporary and permanent alimony, the sum of seventy five dollars each month for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cole v. ColeIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Herrick v. HerrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Smith v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
- Craig v. CraigIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Openshaw v. OpenshawUtah Supreme Court · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Callister v. CallisterUtah Supreme Court · 1953
- Howarth v. HowarthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Pearson v. PearsonUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Jones v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Madsen v. MadsenUtah Supreme Court · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.