Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Auld
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided October 25, 1993No. CV92-345-S-MHWPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Introduction
This matter is before the Court by consent of the parties and Judge Harold L. Ryan’s Order of Reassignment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Currently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. # 38). Defendants move the Court under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint on the grounds that it failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. As Defendants have included matters outside the pleadings, the Court will consider this motion as one for summary judgment under Rule…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Certain Underwriters at Interest at Lloyds of London v. United Parcel Service of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Pietro Culotta Grapes Ltd. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. California · 1996
- Taylor v. Mayflower Transit, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1998
- Nowakowski v. AMERICAN RED BALL TRANSIT CO., INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- NYK Line (North America), Inc. v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.