Fernandez v. Department of Highways
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
Russell Fernandez appeals summary judgment orders of the Clark County Superior Court in favor of the states of Washington and Oregon, and Sverdup & Parcel & Associates (S & P). He asserts that the trial court erred in concluding as a matter of law that: (1) he was a trespasser, and (2) the defendants did not breach their duty to refrain from willfully and wantonly causing injury to him. He also contends that the trial court erred in concluding that it lacked jurisdiction over the State of Oregon. We find no reversible error. Therefore, we affirm.
Fernandez filed suit against S & P and the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Nevada v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- LaPlante v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Universal Adjustment Corp. v. Midland Bank, Ltd., of LondonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Egede-Nissen v. Crystal Mountain, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Coleman v. Ernst Home Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Glover v. State, Department of Transportation, Marine Highway SystemAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Carrigan v. California Horse Racing BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- Marshall v. LABOR & INDUST., STATE OF WASHINGTONDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.