Legal Opinion
Queen City Terminals, Inc. v. Gen. Am. Transp. Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 6, 1995No. 1994-0113PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 73 Ohio St.3d 609.] QUEEN CITY TERMINALS, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES, v. GENERAL AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION ET AL.; TRINITY INDUSTRIES, APPELLANT. [Cite as Queen City Terminals, Inc. v. Gen. Am. Transp. Corp.,
1995-Ohio-285.] Negligence—Proof of indirect economic damages—Tangible physical injury to persons or tangible property damage. In order to recover indirect economic damages in a negligence action, the plaintiff must prove that the indirect economic damages arose from tangible physical injury to persons or from tangible…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Edwards v. AguillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wesley v. WalravenOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co., L.L.C. v. J.K. Meurer Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Cleveland v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Ruckman v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Triad Hunter, L.L.C. v. Eagle Natrium, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.