Legal Opinion
Arlen v. State
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 1980No. 79-363PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.
Appellant asserts two propositions of law that involve the application of R. C. 4731.22 and certain sections of the AMA Code of Ethics.
R. C. 4731.22 states, in pertinent part:
“(B) The [state medical] board shall, t$ the extent permitted by law, limit, reprimand, revoke, suspend, place on probation, refuse to register, or reinstate a certificate for one or more of the following reasons:
<< * * *
“(2) Failure to use reasonable care discrimination in the administration of drugs, or failure to employ acceptable scientific methods in the selection of drugs or other modalities for treatment of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jaffe v. State Department of HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Farrand v. State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Department of Liquor Control v. SantucciOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Doelker v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Shearer v. State Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Pons v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Lies v. Ohio Veterinary Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Levinson v. Connecticut Board of Chiropractic ExaminersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Pons v. Ohio State Med. Bd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
- Appeal of SchrammSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.