Legal Opinion

Department of Liquor Control v. Santucci

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1969No. 68-47PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

In our opinion, the Court of Appeals was too technical. Although proceedings before the Liquor Control Commission of the kind involved here do not come within the category of criminal cases, we think that the rules pertaining to guilty pleas in criminal cases may properly and by analogy be applied.

In the per curiam opinion in the case of McAuley v. Maxwell, 174 Ohio St. 567, 568, 190 N. E. 2d 922, 923, this court said:

“A plea of guilty obviates the necessity of a trial and the presentation of evidence to establish the guilt of the accused. No duty was imposed on the trial court to require or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nelson Gene Johnston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  2. State v. AlfordArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Rafferty v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. AlfordArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. The PEOPLE v. MilaniIllinois Supreme Court · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Paul KaplanskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. Arlen v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Richard T. Kiko Agency, Inc. v. Ohio Department of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Hale v. Ohio State Veterinary Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Mofu v. State, State Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API