Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Burke

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 2004No. 04-354PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Gary Edwards, Robert Cressman, and Yellowstone River Landowners Corporation appeal from a grant of summary judgment to Respondents Greg Burke and Pine Crest Homeowners Association. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction on the grounds that Appellants do not have standing to bring their action.

¶2 We address the following issue on appeal:

¶3 Whether Appellants are tenants in common with the members of Pine Crest Homeowners Association in the ownership of Tract 3.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶4 The roots of this story arise in 1985 when various owners of a subdivision of largely undeveloped…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Marcelo Ramos Motta, Etc. v. Samuel Weiser, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  2. Crane v. CraneUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Liggett v. KoivunenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. Tvedt v. Farmers Insurance Group of CompaniesMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Krumbine v. Lebanon County Tax Claim BureauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ballas v. Missoula City Board of AdjustmentMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In Re Parenting of DAHMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Lee v. Great Divide InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. F.H. v. C.P.H.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Lee v. Great Divide InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API