Legal Opinion

F.H. v. C.P.H.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 2005No. 04-487PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 F.H. and W.H., the maternal grandparents of D.A.H. (D.H.) and G.M.H. (G.H.), appeal the First Judicial District Court’s dismissal of their action for want of jurisdiction. We affirm.

ISSUE

¶2 The dispositive issue before this Court is whether the grandparents have standing to bring this action.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶3 S.H. and C.P.H. (C.H.) are the biological parents of D.H. and G.H. In May 2003, the family moved from Washington to Maine. On August 18, 2003, C.H. assaulted S.H., who required a short hospital stay for her injuries. Upon release from the hospital, S.H. sought a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Phillips v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Marriage of Stoneman v. DrollingerMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Girard v. WilliamsMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Marriage of Firman v. FirmanMontana Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Parenting of DAHMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. City of Missoula v. Mountain Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
  3. City of Missoula v. Mountain Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API