Legal Opinion

Maziar v. Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 24, 2014No. 71068-1-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, J.

¶1 Generally, when a plaintiff brings a maritime claim in state court pursuant to the “saving to suitors” clause,1 article I, section 21 of the Washington Constitution2 establishes the parties’ rights to a jury trial. *215That constitutional provision, however, does not grant such a right to the State of Washington, the party against whom the claim at issue in this case was asserted.

¶2 Plaintiff Scott Maziar initially requested a jury trial. He later moved to strike his jury request, contending that the jury trial right was inapplicable to his cause of action. The State opposed this motion,…

2Cases cited89 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maziar v. Department of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Hugh Bangasser v. Thomas F. BangasserCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. Maziar v. Dep't of Corr.Washington Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API