Legal Opinion

Edelhertz v. City of Middletown

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 8, 2013No. Docket 12-3923-cvPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In 2009, the Common Council of the City of Middletown, New York (“the City”), amended the City’s zoning laws to prohibit the nonconforming use of non-owner-occupied multiple dwellings in various zoning districts. The plaintiffs allege that the City’s failure to notify them, as affected property owners, prior to enacting this zoning change violated their due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Edgardo Ramos, Judge) granted summary judgment to the City, concluding that the change of zoning rules did not offend…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Edelhertz v. City of MiddletownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Obsession Sports Bar & Grill, Inc. v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  2. Argentieri v. Town of EvansDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024
  3. Brennan v. HoehmannDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  4. David Blatt v. Town of Pleasant Valley, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
  5. Obsession Sports Bar & Grill v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API