Legal Opinion
Lane, Ltd. v. Larus & Bros.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 23, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS F. MURPHY, District Judge.
Defendant moves to quash the service of summons and complaint on it on the ground that it is a foreign corporation not doing business in this district, and on the further ground that the person upon whom the process was served is not its general or managing agent.
Defendant is a Virginia corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of cigarettes and smoking tobacco at Richmond and is not authorized to do business in this state, and maintains no office here in its name and has no bank accounts or telephone listings in this state.
This motion raises again the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hutchinson v. Chase & Gilbert, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Brown & Bigelow, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Lehn & Fink Products Corp. v. Milner Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
3Cited by4 opinions
- Floyd B. Burchett, Complainant-Appellee v. Bardahl Oil Company and Nance & Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Demirs v. Plexicraft, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1991
- Floyd B. Burchett, Complainant-Appellee v. Bardahl Oil Company and Nance & Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Frazer v. James S. Lee & Co.Superior Court of Guam · 1978