Legal Opinion
Lehn & Fink Products Corp. v. Milner Products Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 23, 1953PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, District Judge.
Defendant, a Mississippi corporation not licensed to do business in New York, moves to dismiss this action for trademark infringement and unfair competition brought by plaintiff, a Delaware corporation, licensed to do and concededly doing business in New York, on grounds that defendant is not “doing business” in this judicial district under the federal venue statute, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1391(c), and to quash service of process under Rule 4(d) (3), F.R.C.P., 28 U.S.C.A. Alternatively, defendant seeks transfer of this action to the District of Mississippi on grounds of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hutchinson v. Chase & Gilbert, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Brown & Bigelow, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Rhodes v. BarnettDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Harriett MacInnes and Malcolm D. MacInnes Individually and as Husband and Wife v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp., Defendant-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Rayco Manufacturing Co. v. Chicopee Manufacturing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Corporate Dev. Spe., Inc. v. WARREN-TEED PHARM.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Boryk v. deHavilland Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.