State v. Zuniga
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtNewell, J.
in which Alcala, Richardson, Yeary, Keel and Walker, JJ., joined.
When the State charges someone with tampering with physical evidence, is the specific identity of the tampered-with evidence an essential element of the offense? We agree with the State and the court of appeals that it is not. State v. Zuniga, 13-*90414-00316-CR, 2015 WL 4381064, at *3 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi July 16, 2015) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication). However, the court of appeals does not appear to have addressed whether the language in the indictment provided adequate notice of the charged conduct, so we remand the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- State v. MoffCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Lawrence v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- State v. MaysCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2019
- Meza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Anthony Carter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2019
- Aaron York Dean v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2024
- Brandon Keith Harris v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2025
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.