Legal Opinion

State v. Steiger

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2002No. 20010240PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Raymond Steiger appeals from a criminal judgment finding him guilty of failure to register as a sex offender under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-15. Steiger argues the verdict was not supported by sufficient evidence of a changed, unregistered address. Because the evidence supports the trial court’s inference Steiger abandoned his registered address, we affirm the conviction.

I

[¶ 2] Steiger is required to register as a sex offender because of a prior sexual offense conviction in Montana. He registered a Mandan address with North Dakota authorities. While investigating an unrelated…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MorrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. BergerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. TreisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. RubeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. DietzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. RufusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. KellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Binek v. BinekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. BearrunnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. JacksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API