State v. Steiger
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Raymond Steiger appeals from a criminal judgment finding him guilty of failure to register as a sex offender under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-15. Steiger argues the verdict was not supported by sufficient evidence of a changed, unregistered address. Because the evidence supports the trial court’s inference Steiger abandoned his registered address, we affirm the conviction.
I
[¶ 2] Steiger is required to register as a sex offender because of a prior sexual offense conviction in Montana. He registered a Mandan address with North Dakota authorities. While investigating an unrelated…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. MorrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. BergerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. TreisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. RubeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. DietzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. RufusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. KellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Binek v. BinekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BearrunnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. JacksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.