State v. Treis
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Michael Treis appealed from his judgment of conviction after a bench trial for the offense of falsely stating or representing that one has been or is an investigative officer or employed by an investigative or security officer or agency. We affirm, concluding, despite errors in the judgment and errors in correcting the judgment, the defendant was tried for and convicted of the offense charged in the amended complaint; the statutory exception claimed by the defendant did not apply to him; and the defendant was not deprived of constitutional or statutory rights.
I
[¶ 2]…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Allen Perry Soape, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- State v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- City of Grand Forks v. MataNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. MessnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Easlick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
- State v. HilgersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Binek v. BinekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. MarcumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. SteigerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.