Legal Opinion

State v. Bearrunner

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 2019No. 20180258PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jensen, Justice.

[¶ 1] Julian Bearrunner appeals from a criminal judgment entered following convictions of class A misdemeanor criminal trespass and class A misdemeanor engaging in a riot. We affirm Bearrunner's conviction of criminal trespass and reverse the conviction of engaging in a riot.

I

[¶ 2] On February 1, 2017, a large group of individuals, including Bearrunner, gathered in a pasture near the Dakota Access Pipeline to participate in protest activities. The pasture was owned by Energy Transfer Partners. The pasture was separated from the adjacent highway by a barbed wire fence.

[¶ 3] Law…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ElkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. RufusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. BarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. MoosNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Gray v. North Dakota Game and Fish Dept.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dubois v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. SwansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. HoukomNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Schmitz v. State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. NortonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API