Legal Opinion

Adams v. Owen

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 28, 1994No. 93-917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

Appellants contend that the trial judge’s setting aside of a default judgment against JFK Laundry (JFK) and Guy Ramsey was error because the trial court abused its discretion in; (1) granting the motion to set aside the judgment; (2) misinterpreting Ark. Code Ann. § 16-110-407 and (3) finding that Mr. Ramsey had not employed the debtor, Darcy Owen, and that he did not have a financial interest in her place of employment, JFK. We do not reach the merits of appellants’ arguments and affirm the trial court because they have failed to comply with Rule 4-2(a)(6) of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haynes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. BWH, Inc. v. Metropolitan National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Fruit v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dulaney v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Smith v. BabinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Bradford v. BradfordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API