Legal Opinion

Escanaba & L. S. R. Co. v. United State

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided March 10, 1937No. 831PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RAYMOND, District ■ Judge.

Plaintiff seeks, under the authority of 28 U.S.C. §§ 41(28), 45, 46 and 47, (28 U.S.C. A. §§ 41 (28), 45, 46, 47), to enjoin an order and certificate of the Interstate Commerce Commission entered November 18, 1936. The Commission’s report issued therewith is found in Pooling of Ore Traffic in Wisconsin and Michigan, 219 I.C.C. 285. That report and the findings.of fact accompanying this opinion sufficiently state the relationship of the parties and the course of the litigation. Upon oral argument, counsel agreed that the issues here for consideration are greatly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New England Divisions CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Colorado v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Texas & Pac. Ry. v. Gulf, Etc., Ry.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. ILLINOIS CENT. & C. RR v. Inter. Com. Comm.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Escanaba & Lake Superior Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API