Legal Opinion

Escanaba & Lake Superior Railroad v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 28, 1938No. 415PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts

This is an appeal from the judgment of a specially constituted District Court 1 dismissing the appellant’s bill which prayed relief against an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission approving and authorizing a proposed pooling agreement between two other railroads. 2 The single question presented is whether the appellant is a “carrier involved” within the meaning of § 5 (1) of the Interstate Commerce Act. 3

The appellant, hereinafter sometimes called “Esca-naba,” is a Michigan corporation operating a railroad which does business in intrastate and interstate commerce. Its line extends from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Escanaba & L. S. R. Co. v. United StateDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1937

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BargerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Florence Printing Company v. National Labor Relations Board, Charleston Typographical Union No. 43, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  3. Norfolk Southern Bus Corp. v. Virginia Dare Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  4. RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES'ASSOCIATION v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1963
  5. Meyers v. Famous Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API