Legal Opinion
Manhattan Construction Co. v. Rotek, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided August 31, 1995No. 95-C-498-HPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOLMES, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on a Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration by Defendant Rotek, Inc. (“Rotek”). Pursuant to Section Three of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), Rotek asserts that Plaintiffs claims are arbitrable and that the Court should stay this lawsuit until the conclusion of such arbitration. 1 Plaintiff objects to arbitration.
I
The facts necessary for the Court to resolve Rotek’s Motion are not in dispute. See Rotek’s Reply in Support of Its Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration at 2.
Prior to August 19,1993, Plaintiff…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Consarc Corporation v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Manuel KAPLAN; Carol Kaplan; MK Investments, Inc., Appellants, v. FIRST OPTIONS OF CHICAGO, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Adair Bus Sales, Inc. v. Blue Bird CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tralon Corp. v. Cedarapids, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
- Boise Cascade Corp. v. Reliance National Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2001
- NeoChild LLC v. Adventist Health System Sunbelt Healthcare CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020