Legal Opinion

Isho v. Angland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1964No. 37796PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action for the recovery of damages arising from a motor vehicle accident. The accident occurred in Lewis County; the defendant lived in Yakima County.

The plaintiff, being a resident of King County and his medical witnesses residing therein, commenced the action in that county because (in his opinion) it would be the only logical and proper place to try the action.

A defendant ordinarily has the right to have a transitory action commenced against him in the county of his residence; 1 but RCW 4.12.020 (3) 2 gives a plaintiff the option— in an action for the recovery of damages arising…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Russell v. Marenakos Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State ex rel. Owen v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Andrews v. CusinWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Leopold v. LivermoreWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State Ex Rel. De Lape v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shoop v. Kittitas CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. Aydelotte v. AudetteWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Schroeder v. SchroederWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Roy v. City of EverettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  5. Davidson v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API