Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Weyerhaeuser Company

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 30, 1983No. 6503-7-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrie, J.

Plaintiffs and defendant both seek review of a trial court's order which changed venue of this transitory action for monetary damages from Pierce County to King County. Plaintiffs, Frances Rhine Davidson and Carson's Investment Co., Inc., d/b/a R & E Demolitions, contend they properly filed this action in Pierce County pursuant to RCW 4.12.025 as a county in which defendant, Weyerhaeuser Company, transacts business. Weyerhaeuser, on the other hand, contends the trial court erred by not granting its motion to change venue to Snohomish County. We hold that plaintiffs chose an appropriate county…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. De Lape v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Schroeder v. SchroederWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Isho v. AnglandWashington Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ralph v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Marshall v. PittCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  3. Ralph v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API