Decker v. Pierce
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Van Bureij; Des Voignes, J. Bill by Milton L. Decker against George Pierce and another for specific performance of a certain contract, for an injunction restraining defendants from engaging in certain business, and other relief. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.
This bill of complaint was filed in April, 1915, to obtain a decree for a specific performance of a contract made by the parties, and to restrain the defendants from violating such contract, and from engaging in the moving picture business in the village of Paw Paw for a period of five years from December 8, 1913, and from hiring out or working for any other parties that might engage in the said business in said village for a period of two years, from and after the said last-named date. The defendants were the owners and operators of a moving picture business, or show, known as the “Idle…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jaquith v. HudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
- Watrous v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Myer v. HartMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Daily v. LitchfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Davis v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rothenberg v. FollmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Nichols v. SeaksMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Davidow v. Wadsworth Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Randall v. DouglassMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Noble v. SturmMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.