Legal Opinion

Noble v. Sturm

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1920No. Docket No. 62PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Wayne; Mandell (Henry A.), J. Assumpsit by Marian H. Noble against Adolph E. Sturm on a lease. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This case has been brought here by the defendant to review a judgment for the plaintiff in-the court below. The case was tried by the court without a jury, and the findings of fact and conclusions of law are herein set forth. The suit was brought upon a lease ol certain premises in the city of Chicago, Illinois, entered into July 8, 1911, at Chicago, between the plaintiff as lessor, and the defendant Sturm and one J. D. Isaacs as lessees. Isaacs is now dead and Sturm is a resident of Detroit. The lease is known in the record as Exhibit “A.” The original lease contains clauses 6, 7, 8 and 10,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jaquith v. HudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Sexton v. Chicago Storage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Daily v. LitchfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Iroquois Furnace Co. v. Wilkin Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Consolidated Coal Co. v. PeersIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re ZakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
  2. In Re RobertsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1985
  3. Burns Trading Co. v. WelbornCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  4. Commissioner of Insurance v. Massachusetts Accident Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Central Trust Co. v. WolfMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API