Legal Opinion

Neth v. St. John's Reformed Church

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1939No. Appeal, 69PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

This is an appeal from a decree dismissing a bill for specific performance of a contract for the sale of land. The Chancellor found that there was no “meeting of the minds of the parties” and therefore no contract. The court in banc agreed Avith him and the decree nisi Avas made absolute. The reason given by the court for this order Avas that “the contract in question was not signed by the vendor or grantor” and that there was not sufficient evidence in writing of the contract to remove it from the Statute of Frauds and that the authority of the appellees’ agents…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sferra v. UrlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Brown, to Use v. Aiken (Forte)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Peoples Trust Co. v. Consumers Ice & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Schwartz v. Mahoning Valley Country ClubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Von Mailath v. Order of Daughters of Divine RedeemerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Neth v. KaylorDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Woman's Christian Temperance Union v. Bearhalter, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API