Legal Opinion

Brown, to Use v. Aiken (Forte)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1937No. Appeal, 303PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

This appeal arises from a decree of the Court of Common Pleas No. 2 of Philadelphia County, awarding judgment to the appellee on a petition and answer in proceedings for tlie recovery of possession of real estate under the Act of April 20, 1905, P. L. 239 (12 P. S. 2571 et seq.). The petition for citation was for the recovery of possession of premises at 4716-18-20 Baltimore Avenue, Philadelphia, a motion picture theatre property, and was instituted against Earl M. Forte, the person in possession of the premises, as respondent, on behalf of Northern Trust Company…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Teal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Emerson v. SlaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. Imperator Realty Co. v. . TullNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Swain v. SeamansSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. Corporation for the Relief of Poor Distressed Presbyterian v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1831

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hostetter v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co. v. HenshawSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Target Sportswear, Inc. v. Clearfield FoundationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Edelstein v. Carole House Apartments, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Miners Savings Bank v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API