Department of Fish, Wildlife & Parks v. Montana Stockgrowers Ass'n
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Water Court, Upper Missouri Division, finding the appellant, the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks (Department), liable for attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by the Montana Stockgrowers Association, Inc. (Stockgrowers). We reverse.
The sole issue on appeal is:
Whether the Water Court erred in awarding attorneys’ fees and costs to the Stockgrowers, who prevailed against the Department in a case involving the public’s recreational use rights of the waters in Bean Lake.
This issue arose out of this Court’s decision in the Bean Lake case. Matter…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re the Marriage of HerefordMontana Supreme Court · 1986
- Cate v. HargraveMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re the Adjudication of the Existing Rights to the Use of All the Water Both Surface & Underground, Within the Dearborn Drainage AreaMontana Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sunburst School District No. 2 v. Texaco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
- Montanans for the Responsible Use of the School Trust v. State Ex Rel. Board of Land CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- Finke v. State Ex Rel. McGrathMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re the Adjudication of the Existing Rights to the Use of All the WaterMontana Supreme Court · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.