Legal Opinion

Finke v. State Ex Rel. McGrath

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 2003No. 01-815PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 This is an original proceeding in which three individual electors and six municipal governments seek a declaratory judgment on the constitutionality of Senate Bill 242 (SB 242). We strike SB 242 in its entirety for the reasons set forth below.

ISSUES

¶2 Restated, the issues presented to this Court are:

1. Whether the election provisions of SB 242 limiting participation to “record owners of real property” are unconstitutional;

2. Whether the unconstitutional provisions are severable from the constitutional provisions of SB 242; and

3. Whether Plaintiffs are entitled to recover attorneys’ fees…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. City of Phoenix v. KolodziejskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Holt Civic Club v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Sunburst School District No. 2 v. Texaco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Reichert v. STATE EX REL. McCULLOCHMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Chase v. Bearpaw Ranch Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Williams v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. PPL MONTANA, LLC v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API