Legal Opinion

Enterprise Co. v. Neely

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 15, 1920No. 1007PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

On September 30, 1916, the Enterprise Company, plaintiff in error, as the first party, and Erastus and Grover Neely, defendants in error, as the second parties, entered into a written contract, whereby it was agreed that the Neelys would cultivate and gather a crop of cotton to be grown in 1917 on 80 acres of land owned by the company. The material provisions of the contract, as pertinent to this appeal, are as. follows: The Neelys agreed to farm and cultivate the land in a thorough and farmer-like manner and as frequently as needed, to keep the irrigation ditches and borders in proper…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Linch v. Paris Lumber and Grain Elevator Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Carroll v. WelchTexas Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Felton v. TalleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  4. Riggs v. HordeTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Shrewsbury v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hoffer Oil Corp. v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Weissberger v. Brown-Bellows-Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Kellogg v. Southwestern Lumber Co. of New JerseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Continental Nat. Bank v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Boyden v. United Mercury Mines Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API