Legal Opinion

Continental Nat. Bank v. Conner

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 27, 1948No. 14904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice. •

On' the 21st day of July, 1945, appellees, H. M. Conner et ux., executed a builder’s contract with one A. D. Womack, for the purpose of employing Womack to build one five room frame building and a two car frame garage on Lot No. 11 in Block No. 4 of Homer L. Aikman Addition to the City of Fort Worth in Tarrant County, Texas. For such construction appellees agreed to pay $4250.00 and for a guaranty of such payment they executed one promissory note of even date, payable to Wo-mack on or before ninety days after date, secured by a materialman’s lien. The contract provided that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mathes v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Enterprise Co. v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Kirby Lumber Co. v. R. L. Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Kansas City, El Paso & Mexican Railway Co. v. PerkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Kelsay Lumber Co. v. CrowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cont'nal Natl. Bk. of Ft. Worth v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Kleiner v. EubankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Beeman v. WorrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Foundation Securities Corp. v. PittardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API