Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Huff

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1934No. 24590PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

The single question now requiring the attention of this court is whether this record contains competent evidence with reference to which reasonable minds might differ, therefore necessitating its submission to the jury.

What proof is there to substantiate the plaintiff’s claim that the defendant gave her husband general authority to use an automobile in his work? On page 39 of the printed record Mr. Huff said: “It was understood when I took the job I had to use an automobile.” Because of its obvious incompetency the court promptly excluded this testimony. However, on page 40 of the record Mr.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hamden Lodge No. 517 v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Bauer v. Cleveland Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Ewald v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  4. Miller v. J. A. Tyrholm Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Durbin v. Humphrey Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API