Legal Opinion

Hoover v. Sandifur

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1946No. 29958PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to compel specific performance of an option clause contained in a contract entered into between him and the defendant C. Paul Sandifur on November 19, 1942. The court sustained a demurrer to the complaint; whereupon plaintiff filed an amended complaint, a demurrer to which the court also sustained. The plaintiff refused to plead further, and the court entered judgment dismissing the action. Plaintiff appeals.

So far as concerns the question to be determined on this appeal, the essential facts set up in the amended complaint may be summarized as follows:

Prior to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. The ProtectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. State v. ComerWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Perkins v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Scott v. Commissioner of Civil ServiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Darnall v. DaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  2. McKennon v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. New York Life Ins. Co. v. DurhamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  4. Christensen v. Sterling InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Burger v. Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API