Legal Opinion

Walmsley v. McCuen

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 17, 1994No. 94-981PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This is an election case. The appellants, Bill Walmsley and others, sought to enjoin the appellee, Secretary of State W.J. “Bill” McCuen, from placing on the November 8, 1994, general election ballot a proposed amendment to the Arkansas Constitution. In the alternative they asked that, if votes are cast on the proposed amendment, Mr. McCuen be enjoined from counting or certifying them. The Chancellor declined to issue the injunction. We reverse and remand the case for entry of the injunction which was sought.

Proposed Constitutional Amendment #3 was referred by the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chaney v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. Becker v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Becker v. RiviereSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Davis v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  5. Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Priest v. PolkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Thiel v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. McCuen v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. McCuen v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. McCuen v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API