Legal Opinion

Leo Michuda & Son Co. v. Metropolitan Sanitary District

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 15, 1981No. 80-3159PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Defendant Brant Construction Company, Inc. (Brant), defendant Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago (the District), and defendant Melvin K. Goldman, purchasing agent of the District, appeal from an order issued by the trial court permanently enjoining Brant and the District from executing any contract documents for a construction project entitled “Replace Roof on Digester 2 and Miscellaneous Work, Contract 78 — 208—2P” (the project) and from engaging in the performance of any work described therein and enjoining the District and Goldman from awarding any contract for the project…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Township of Hillside v. SterninSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Solomon v. City of EvanstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. King v. Alaska State Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People Ex Rel. Rappaport v. DrazekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. Glen Truck Sales & Service, Inc. v. SirignanoNew York Supreme Court · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Spawglass Construction Corp. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  2. Bodine Elec. of Champaign v. City of ChampaignAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Smith v. Intergovernmental Solid Waste Disposal Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Keefe-Shea Joint Venture, Inc. v. City of EvanstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. In Re the Appeal of Associated Sign & Post, IncIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API