People v. Davis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: After reviewing the record of the Wade hearing and examining the photo array in question, we conclude that there is no merit to defendant’s claim that the photographic array was unduly suggestive. Although only 3 of the 6 photographs in the array were of men wearing glasses, the record is clear that the victim was unsure whether the man who attempted to rob him wore glasses, although it was a possibility. The photo array depicts six males all about the same age with similar facial features and was not so suggestive that the witnesses’ attention was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. HernandezNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. DuboisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. OfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. GettysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. SieteskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997