Legal Opinion
People v. Ofield
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 7, 2001PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of attempted robbery in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 160.10 [2] [a]). Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel as a result of defense counsel’s failure to object when the complainant, a former prosecutor, testified on direct examination by the prosecutor concerning her pretrial identification of defendant from a photo array and her subsequent identification of defendant at the preliminary hearing. The photo array was admitted in evidence.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. LindsayNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. WallaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. CarvalhoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. GrimesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. MeadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. ArmstrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.