People v. Gonzalez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We find no merit to defendant’s claim that the photographic array shown to a witness was unduly *962suggestive. Although defendant claims that he was the only Hispanic in the photo array, we note that it depicts six males all about the same age with similar facial features and was not so suggestive that the witness’s attention was drawn to only one subject (see, People v Davis, 148 AD2d 952, lv denied 74 NY2d 663; People v Dubois, 140 AD2d 619, 622, lv denied 72 NY2d 911). Defendant’s claim that the photo array was unduly suggestive is further belied by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. KeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- People v. DuboisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. GallettiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. ChiarenzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992