Legal Opinion
Hill v. Kemp
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 6, 2007No. 05-5160PublishedCited by 184 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GORSUCH, Circuit Judge.
Certain individuals who license and operate their cars in the State of Oklahoma (the “Motorists”), together with the Oklahoma Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice Education Fund, Inc. (“ORC”), argue that Oklahoma’s statutory scheme for specialty motor vehicle license plates is unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. In claims one through four of their amended complaint, the Motorists contend that Oklahoma’s laws unlawfully discriminate against their views by permitting drivers to obtain license plates bearing the messages “Adoption Creates…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by184 opinions
- Prost v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. PruittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Wheeler v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Chamber of Commerce of United States v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.