Legal Opinion
Morris v. Morris
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 30, 2010No. 10AP-15PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
French, Judge.
{¶ 1} Appellants, Richard Barry (“Barry”) and Barry Industries, Inc. (“BI”) (collectively, “appellants”), appeal from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas’ denial of their motion to stay proceedings pending arbitration. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.
{¶ 2} Because this action has not proceeded past the pleadings, and because we review only the trial court’s denial of a motion to stay proceedings pending arbitration, we glean the following brief factual background from the pleadings and the relevant contracts filed in the trial court, and we discuss the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Williams v. Aetna Finance Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- DSS Servs., L.L.C. v. Eitel's Towing, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Chrysler Fin. Servs. v. HendersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Fried, Admin. v. Friends of Breakthrough SchoolsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Crosscut Capital, L.L.C. v. DewittOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- John A. Becker Co. v. Jedson Eng'g, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.