Legal Opinion

Simko v. Blake

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1995No. 97579, (Calendar No. 8)Published

1Opinion of the Court

448 Mich. 648 (1995)

532 N.W.2d 842

SIMKO

v.

BLAKE

Docket No. 97579, (Calendar No. 8).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued October 5, 1994.

Decided May 23, 1995.

E. Robert Blaske and Thomas H. Blaske for the plaintiffs.

Plunkett & Cooney, P.C. (by Christine D. Oldani, Mary Massaron Ross, and Patrick M. Barrett), for the defendant.

MALLETT, J.

This case presents the question whether an attorney's duty to his client extends beyond what is legally adequate to win a client's case. We hold that attorneys must only act as would an attorney of ordinary learning, judgment, or skill under the same or similar…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. PickensMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Gebhardt v. O'ROURKEMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Simko v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Rorrer v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API