Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 16, 1907No. 64PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Certiorari, from Chatham superior court — Judge Carm. February 15, 1906.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

The following question was, in conformity to law,

certified to the Supreme Court, to the end that it might be dec-ided whether the act in question (Acts 1904, p. 100) is or is not unconstitutional for anjr reason referred to in the question: “Is the act approved August 13, 1904, entitled ‘An act providing for the situs of debts due to non-residents for the purposes of attachment, and for other purposes/ (found in Georgia Laws, 1904, p. 100), contrary either to the constitution of the United States or to the constitution of the State of Georgia, for the reason that the legislature of Georgia…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Reeves v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Saffold v. Scottish American Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Drake v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. High v. PadrosaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lears v. Seaboard Air-Line RailwayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  2. Southern Ry. Company v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Smith v. Georgia Granite Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. RollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  5. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc. v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API