Southern Railway Co. v. Rollins

1. Neither the exemption provided by the laws of -this State, nor that provided by the laws of the State of the debtor’s residence, affords protection against process of garnishment to subject in this State wages of non-residents which have been earned within this State. Civil Code (1910), § 5095; Kile v. Montgomery, 73 Ga. 338 (3); Harvey v. Thompson, 2 Ga. App. 569 (5) (60 S. E. 11).

2. The finding of the jury upon the question, as to the debtor’s residence at the time the garnishment proceeding by attachment was instituted can not, under the evidence, though the evidence was -conflicting,…