Legal Opinion

Southern Ry. Company v. Coleman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 21, 1949No. 32636PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorrill, J.

The sole question presented by this record is whether wages of persons who reside out of the State, which wages have been earned wholly without the State, are subject to garnishment in a case which is not brought by writ of attachment.

Phil H. Coleman, the defendant in the divorce and alimony case, voluntarily submitted himself to the jurisdiction of Fulton Superior Court by acknowledging service, waiving process, and by consenting to the rendition of a judgment by the court against him and obligating him to pay a stated amount of alimony for his wife and for the support of his minor children.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Epps & Leabow v. BuckmasterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Harvey v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Harvey v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Tate v. LeresCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Phillips v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc. v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. WT Grant Company v. General Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. Collins v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Pollock Paper Corp. v. KleboldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API