Legal Opinion
Holk v. Snapple Beverage Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 12, 2009No. 08-3060PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents three issues related to the federal preemption of state causes of action. Plaintiff-appellant Stacy Hoik brought several state law claims against defendant-appellee the Snapple Beverage Corporation in the Superior Court of New Jersey. After removing Hoik’s lawsuit to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Snapple sought to dismiss Hoik’s complaint on, inter alia, the grounds of express preemption, implied field preemption, and implied conflict preemption. The District Court granted Snapple’s motion on the basis of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Inc. v. Dentsply International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Walter Shuker v. Smith & Nephew PLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Farina v. Nokia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Reid v. Johnson & Johnson & McNeil Nutritionals, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- TD Bank NA v. Vernon Hill, IICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.